2019/06/03
Minutes of the special Planning Meeting of the Parish Council, held on Tuesday 28th May 2019 in the Village Hall at 7.30pm.
Minutes
of the special Planning Meeting of the Parish Council, held on Tuesday 28th May 2019 in the Village
Hall at 7.30pm.
1. Apologies. None.
Present: Cllrs. Marion Dethier,
Brian Gale, Simon Howes (Chairman), Patricia Lennard and Rodney Young.
Also present: the Clerk together
with sixteen members of the public.
2.
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (As Amended)
Reference: 18/19/00001/DT.
Type: Full Planning Permission.
Proposal: Erection of two detached
dormer bungalows.
Location: Glebe House, Front
Street, Chedzoy, Bridgwater, TA7 8RB.
Applicant: Harris Bros and Collard
Ltd.
The Chairman
welcomed everyone, and opened the meeting to the public to allow full
discussion.
Following the
full discussion the following comments were sent in to Sedgemoor
Planners:
Comments
from Chedzoy Parish Council regarding the proposed development.
Further to our
email of 30/03/19 we are now writing to you with updated comments
following our review of the amended plans for the proposed development.
Chedzoy Parish
Council held a special planning meeting on Tuesday 28th May 2019 to
review the amended plans and to provide a forum for public discussion
of the above development. This message forms the formal response of the
Parish Council.
Official response.
Having listened to the views of Chedzoy residents and parish
councillors at the special meeting. Chedzoy Parish Council shares
concerns expressed both by immediate neighbours and the wider village
community with respect to the following issues:-
a.
Layout, density and design:
- Ridge
height raised from 5.2m to 6.5m giving concerns regarding changing the
character and outlook of the area.
- Addition
of dormer windows will create a new problem of overlooking into
adjacent properties (which are nor shown adequately in the amended
plans and are almost out of view on the bottom of the page).
- Additional
floor space of circa 16%, extra bedrooms and bathrooms will place an
additional burden on access, car parking, water supply (existing
pressure is already too low for many local residents), sewerage.
b. Loss of outlook, overshadowing, and
light – this previously raised issue has not been resolved in
the amended design and will in all probability be made worst by the
suggestion of a raised roof height from 5.2m to 6.5m along with the
proposed addition of dormer windows and first floor living space.
c. Highways issues – the previously
raised concerns have not been addressed in the amended design and will
be made worse by the proposed additional bedrooms increasing the likely
occupancy and number of vehicles using the site.
d. Ecological issues – concerns
raised over lack of clarity and consistency of the proposed retention
of existing trees and hedgerows, and also plans for additional trees.
e. Drainage – additional concerns
raised at the removal of the previous recommendation to connect the
properties to mains drainage with potential for impact of proposed
soakaways on adjacent properties.
f. Fire safety and emergency access – strong
concerns that the inspection by the Devon and Somerset fire officer is
based on the previous design and will need to be reviewed with
particular concern regarding access / egress for pedestrians, vehicles
and likely impact of access for emergency vehicles.
g. Quality and consistency of the
information provided by the developer. The amended plans are
inconsistent in the number and location of windows, trees and
landscaping. The plans do not adequately reflect the relationship of
the development with adjacent properties, particularly those which
would be overlooked by the proposed second storey and dormer windows.
Whilst many of
these issues have previously been raised by members of the public
through their direct responses and input into the planning process, the
latest amended design does not seem to have addressed most of these
concerns, or to have been reviewed by the consulted experts. Therefore
the reports from ecology, drainage, highways, environmental health,
fire service etc. appear to be based on the previously submitted
design. Material changed to the plans in the amended application
require full re-appraisal from consulted experts to assess any changes
to impact and determine if any new objections are forthcoming from
those consulted.
Whilst there is
strong opposition to the proposed development in its current form,
there is a sense from the community that some development of the site
may be inevitable. There may be more acceptance of any future proposals
if the developer reduced the roof height back to 5.2m and removed the
dormer windows, thereby returning the development to two single storey
bungalows (or one larger single storey bungalow). Acceptance from the
local community may also be more likely once concerns regarding the
impact on traffic, access, water pressure, existing trees and wildlife
habitat are fully dealt with.
2. Consider co-option of one member. The
Clerk explained that in order to continue the period in which the
Parish Council could co-opt a new member to fill the remaining place on
the council (following the election) without the need to advertise the
vacancy, it now needs to 'consider' the matter. This was noted.
There being no
other business, the meeting was declared closed at 8.35 pm.